Transfer pricing has always been a hot topic in China. It involves one branch of a company to set a price for physical goods or services when selling to another branch (usually a foreign one) of the same company. When one branch is based in a high tax-paying country, for example China, and sells to a related branch in a low-tax area, the company can make a low profit in the first country and a high profit in the second.
As a result, China has been experiencing high growths of tax evasion. According to the Ministry of Commerce, in August 2004, transfer pricing was the method used in approximately 60% of all foreign company tax evasion cases. This has caused an estimated annual tax revenue loss of RMB 30 billion, causing the Chinese government to take notice and instigate a national campaign to prevent transfer pricing.
One method to avoid being investigated is by applying for Advance Pricing Agreements (APA) with the Chinese Tax Authorities. China's State Administration of Taxation (SAT) issued on the 20th September 2004 the Guo Shui Fa [2004] 118, "The Implementation Rules on Advanced Pricing Agreement for Transactions between Related Parties," which provides formal guidance to foreign enterprises in China.
History of APA's
When the SAT issued "The Taxation Management Regulations for Business Transactions between Associated Enterprises" in 1998, widely known as Circular 59, it was China's first approach towards APAs. The document covered the subject, which taxpayers may propose pricing principles and calculation methods to the tax authorities to determine transfer prices with associated Enterprises.
Then, in September 2002, "The Implementation Rules of Tax Collection and Administration Law", Article 53 was issued, which allowed taxpayers to apply to the tax authorities for APAs.
Since then, more than 130 unilateral APAs have been concluded, but the lack of uniformed formal rules was still a stumbling block for multinational corporations (MNC's) with subsidiaries in different regions of China. A draft of the APA rules was issued in May 2003 for comments, and the revised Implementation Rules were issued in September 2004.
Overview
The Implementation Rules apply to unilateral, bilateral and multilateral APAs. An unilateral APA is an agreement between a taxpayer and the respective Chinese tax authority, where as one or more respective authorities of China's tax treaty countries are involved in a bilateral or multilateral APA.
The APA Term may range from 2 to 4 years, starting from the year after the formal application. The application year can be included, which means the term effectively can be between 3 to 5 years. Until the Implementation Rules were issued in September, MNCs with multiple subsidiaries in China experienced problems with the lack of coordination and communication between the local Chinese tax bureaus in different regions. Under Chinese law, legally separate entities in different regions cannot file consolidated tax returns, which meant that each entity has to file an APA with its respective local authority. The Implementation Rules ensure the coordination by issuing procedures for the tax bureaus in the different regions or provinces to communicate between themselves. Local tax bureaus have the responsibility to ensure coordination between the tax authorities in the different regions, where as the SAT has the responsibility to monitor coordination amongst tax authorities in different provinces. The SAT will also be responsible for the coordination, guidance or even direct handling if an APA involves more than two provinces, is a bilateral or multilateral APA or covers inter-company transactions of more than RMB 10 million.
The Process of applying for an APA
The process of applying for an APA has been separated into six steps:
Transfer Pricing Enforcement
Additionally, on the 22nd October 2004, Circular [2004] 143 was issued by the SAT, which is an amendment to Circular [1998] 59 of the Guo Shui Fa. The amendments cover three areas of the enforcement of the transfer pricing:
When audited, the new Circular also gives the taxpayer the opportunity to request a 30 day extension to submit all requested information from the original 60 days.The SAT also addresses the double taxation issue in the transfer pricing rules in the Circular [2004] 143. The audited taxpayer can request in writing a corresponding adjustment if an income adjustment results in possible domestic double taxation.
Due to the losses incurred by the Chinese tax authorities, the government has become more stringent and developed training programs for its tax evasion investigators to take notice of serious transfer pricing of MNCs. It also shows the reforms taking place by the tax authorities gearing towards a more simplified taxation system, a broader tax collection basis, lower tax rates and stricter tax collection.
If you require assistance with the above subject, please contact us at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it with your detailed questions.
All information in this report is verified to the best of our ability and is assumed to be correct at time of release; however, Klako Group does not accept responsibility for any losses arising from reliance on the information provided within.
|
North China: |
Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian Shanghai, Hangzhou Guangzhou, Shenzhen Chengdu Hong Kong, Singapore |
A Monthly Magazine on Investment, Tax & Operational Issues for Foreign Companies in China
