Intellectual
Property Rights in China
By
Klaus Koehler, Managing Director, Klako Group
In
theory, protection of intellectual property rights in China has
almost reached international standards. The importance of intellectual
property, a relatively new idea in China, is now widely recognised.
Authorities and businesses in China understand that protection of
intellectual property not only benefits foreign investment but also
domestic companies. In court, various intellectual property cases
have been settled, in favor of the intellectual property right owner.
In addition, the country's top law schools now offer courses on
intellectual property law.
China is a signatory to key international intellectual property
agreements. Relevant legislation has been implemented, most prominently
on trademark, patent and copyright laws, and regulations on software
protection.
In
reality, however, China still faces serious problems in the area
of intellectual property protection. Often, local protectionism
and a lack of truly independent enforcement authorities prevents
prosecution and punishment of intellectual property infringers.
Over
the past years, continued progress has occurred and the Chinese
government has made the protection of intellectual property a priority.
State Council leaders have demonstrated their understanding of the
widespread economic losses suffered by foreign and Chinese companies
alike due to Intellectual Property Rights violations. It has become
clear that the lack of Intellectual Property Rights protection is
a severe constraint on the development of creative products. Additionally,
since China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), a
growing number of counterfeit and pirated products are being exported,
which increases the risk of friction with trading partners and damages
China's international reputation.
For
those who attempt to protect their Intellectual Property Rights
via the courts, there are still many impediments to successful litigation.
The resources of the police, prosecutors, and relevant administrative
agencies are insufficient, and the court system has a shortage of
adequately trained judges. Resolving the few cases brought before
the court can take almost a year. The government is making an effort
to train more judges through improved funding of university law
departments and training programs such as the EU-China Intellectual
Property Program.
China's
copyright law
China's
copyright law spells out the nature of copyright protection, confirms
its ability to be assigned and prescribes the contract terms for
copyright assignment.
Strong enforcement measures have been introduced to combat copyright
infringement. The burden of proof is placed on the party suspected
of infringement. Publishers, manufacturers, or distributors unable
to prove that their copying is authorized are being held liable.
China's
patent law
The
remedies of original right holders have been strengthened. For instance,
design patents may not conflict with another's prior legal rights.
Prior legal rights include copyrights, trademarks, enterprise names
and unique packaging or branding associated with well-known products.
The rights of an original patent holder shall prevail in a patent
dispute.
Offering
for sale counterfeit goods is viewed as an infringing activity.
This means that preemptive action can be taken against those offering
to sell counterfeit goods but who have not participated in their
manufacture, distribution, or wholesale.
Patent administrative authorities handle infringement cases and
have the power to order the infringing party to stop all such acts
immediately. However, due to a lack of resources enforcement remains
problematic.
The
law attempts to ensure compensation for the patent owner by providing
judges with a variety of calculation methods, such as, an amount
equivalent to the royalties the patent owner should have received
for such use. Where this is impracticable, fixed amounts may be
awarded in compensation. However, these sums still fail to provide
an effective deterrent.
China's
trademark law
Collective
trademarks, certification trademarks, three-dimensional signs and
geographical indications have been included in the trademark law.
Courts have the power to order an infringing party to cease its
use and in some cases order property preservation.
When
a trademark is removed from goods and replaced by a different trademark
for the purposes of further sale, this is recognized as an infringing
activity. The Administration for Industry and Commerce (AIC) must
destroy all infringing goods, regardless of whether or not the trademark
can be removed and fines may be issued.
Extending
slightly beyond the strict requirements of the WTO, the trademark
law provides a clear deterrent effect and significant certainty.
Anti-counterfeiting
measures taken by the Chinese Government
Counterfeiters
are threatened with criminal liability and imprisonment, as opposed
to civil penalties. Illegal gains must exceed a minimum amount before
a criminal prosecution can be brought. If it cannot be shown that
the quality of the contraband is inferior, the illegal gains must
be even higher. Small-scale counterfeiters often escape with low
fines offering minimal deterrent whereas the Intellectual Property
Right holder's compensation is usually very small.
Remittance
of royalties for licensed Intellectual Property Rights
There
is widespread concern regarding recent difficulties in arranging
the remittance of royalties for licensed Intellectual Property Rights.
The State Administration for Foreign Exchange has issued notices
requiring banks to inspect specific documents related to the recording
or approval of Intellectual Property Right licenses and tax-paid
certification or tax-exempt certification. Unfortunately, it is
very difficult and often impossible to process the required documentation
in a timely manner.
China
is facing the challenge to translate the improved legal framework
into a significantly improved environment at the local level. Strengthening
the existing alternatives to litigation would help relieve the pressures
faced by the legal system. Many Chinese jurists believe that the
application of global standards, including arbitration, to settle
economic disputes will become a common practice in China. Though
the majority of domestic companies are not yet familiar with international
arbitration practices, WTO regulations will be applied in order
to protect the legal interests of both domestic and foreign organizations.
If you require assistance with the above subject, please contact
us at info@klako.com with your detailed questions.
All information in this report is verified to the best of our ability
and is assumed to be correct at time of release; however, Klako
Group does not accept responsibility for any losses arising from
reliance on the information provided within.
|